AN EXAMINATION OF THE RIGHT TO LIFE AND THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF DEATH PENALTY IN UGANDA: A CASE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL VS. SUZAN KIGULA AND 417

  • Type: Project
  • Department: Law
  • Project ID: LAW0466
  • Access Fee: ₦5,000 ($14)
  • Pages: 110 Pages
  • Format: Microsoft Word
  • Views: 798
  • Report This work

For more Info, call us on
+234 8130 686 500
or
+234 8093 423 853

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Declaration ................................................................................................................. I

Approval ..................................................................................................................... ll

Dedication ................................................................................................................. lll

Acknowledgement ................................................................................................... IV

List of instruments ................................................................................................... V

List of cases ............................................................................................................... VI

Bibliography ............................................................................................................. VII

Acronyms ................................................................................................................ VIII

Table of contents ..................................................................................................... IX

CHAPTER ONE ............................................................................................................ 1

1..0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................... 1

1.1 Background of the study ..................................................................................... 2

1.2 Statement of the problem .................................................................................. 6

1.3 Aims and objectives of the study ....................................................................... 6

1.4 Research questions .............................................................................................. 7

1.5 Significance of the study ..................................................................................... 7

1.6 Research methodology ........................................................................................ 8

1. 7 Scope of the study ................................................................................................ 9

1.8 Outline of the chapters ...................................................................................... 10

CHAPTER TWO: ......................................................................................................... 12

2.0 LITERATURE REVIEW ........................................................................................ 12

2.1 Ugandan view on death sentence SUZAN KIGULA Vs .................................... 12

2.2. International view on death penalty in relation to human rights ............... 14

2.2.11nternationallnstruments on death penalty in relation to human rights21

2.2.2 Universal Declaration of Human Rights {UDHR) .......................................... 22

2.2.3 International Convention on Civil and Political Rights {ICCPR) .................. 23

X

2.2.4 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, inhuman or Degrading ..... 29

2.3 Regional Instruments on death penalty in relation to human rights ........... 32

2.3.1 The African Charter on Human Rights {ACHR) .............................................. 32

2.3.2 European Court of Human Rights & European Convention on Human

Rights {ECHR) ............................................................................................................... 36

CHAPTER THREE ........................................................................................................ .40

3.0THE DEATH PENALTY IN UGANDA .................................................................. 40

3.1 Background to death penalty ............................................................................ .40

3.2 The mandatory death penalty in Uganda ......................................................... 44

3.3 Exemptions to the mandatory death penalty in Uganda ............................... 46

3.4 Process of sentencing and execution ................................................................ 49

3.5 Death row phenomenon and fundamental human rights ............................. 53

3.6 The death penalty and the right to fair trial. .................................................... 56

3.7 Uganda's compliance and non- compliance with the International Human

Rights standards ......................................................................................................... 57

CHAPTER FOUR ........................................................................................................... 63

4.0 ARGUMENTS FOR AND AGAINST DEATH PENALTY ......................................... 63

4.1 Arguments in retention's states ......................................................................... 63

4.2 Arguments in abolitionist states ......................................................................... 68

4. 3The political context in Uganda .......................................................................... 71

4.4 Kantian Ethics on the death penalty .................................................................. 74

4.5The theory of death penalty as cruel, inhuman or degrading form

Of punishment.. ........................................................................................................... 77

4.6 The death row phenomenon and the principle of judicial discretion ........... 79

XI

CHAPTER FIVE ............................................................................................................. 82

5.0 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION$ ....................................................... 82

5.1 Summary of chapters .......................................................................................... 82

5.2Recommendations ................................................................................................. 82

5.3 Conclusions ............................................................................................................ 89

CHAPTER ONE 1.0 INTRODUCTION Death penalty is a legal process whereby a person is put to death by the state as a punishment for the crime1. Crimes that can result in a death penalty are known as capital offenses. The term capital originates from the Latin word "capita/is", which literally mean "of the head", derived via the Latin capita/is from caput, the head. In this context alluded to execution by beheading. Globally there is a clear trend that is geared towards limiting the use of death penalty, notably, the number of countries that either limit or abolish the use of capital punishment is on the rise.150 countries out of the 193 United Nations (UN) members states have abolished the death penalty. 2 The death penalty is therefore, currently confined to a small minority of countries like Uganda. In the promulgation process of the 1995 Uganda constitution a lot of debate was on the retention of death penalty that was greatly opposed by majority of the citizen; thus upon enactment it is sanctioned by Article 22(1) of the constitution which provides that: "No person shall be deprived of life intentionally except in execution of a sentence passed in a fair trial by a court of competent jurisdiction in respect of a criminal offence under the laws of Uganda and the conviction and sentence have been confirmed by the highest appellate court." The statutes that attracts or prescribe offences that attract the death penalty are: The Penal Code Act Cap 1203, The Anti-Terrorism Act 20024 amended in 2015 and The Uganda Peoples Defense Force (UPDF) Act Cap 307 Laws of Uganda 19925•

AN EXAMINATION OF THE RIGHT TO LIFE AND THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF DEATH PENALTY IN UGANDA: A CASE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL VS. SUZAN KIGULA AND 417
For more Info, call us on
+234 8130 686 500
or
+234 8093 423 853

Share This
  • Type: Project
  • Department: Law
  • Project ID: LAW0466
  • Access Fee: ₦5,000 ($14)
  • Pages: 110 Pages
  • Format: Microsoft Word
  • Views: 798
Payment Instruction
Bank payment for Nigerians, Make a payment of ₦ 5,000 to

Bank GTBANK
gtbank
Account Name Obiaks Business Venture
Account Number 0211074565

Bitcoin: Make a payment of 0.0005 to

Bitcoin(Btc)

btc wallet
Copy to clipboard Copy text

Details

Type Project
Department Law
Project ID LAW0466
Fee ₦5,000 ($14)
No of Pages 110 Pages
Format Microsoft Word

Related Works

TABLE OF CONTENTS Declaration ................................................................................................................. I Approval ..................................................................................................................... ll Dedication... Continue Reading
  • Type:Project
  • ID:LAW0466
  • Department:Law
  • Pages:110
TABLE OF CONTENTS DECLARATION ................................................................................................................................... ii APPROVAL .......................................................................................................................................... iii DEDICATION... Continue Reading
ABSTRACT This research project examines the challenges confronted by a developing country such as Uganda in continuing with legal provisions that gives death penalty a chance to exist. Despite facing acute and intractable problems of poverty, Uganda has moved a step to adopt some of the provisions of International Covenant on Civil and Political... Continue Reading
ABSTRACT The death penalty is associated with two fundamental human rights; the right to life and the protection against cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment or punishment. This research sought to establish whether the death penalty as practiced in Kenya conforms to comparative and international human rights norms. It analyzed the legality of... Continue Reading
ABSTRACT Folklore as an aspect of the African oral tradition has been traced to traditional African society handed down by customs, beliefs and an aspect of culture handed down by our for forefathers through orature.  Conflict that arises over death and the quest for re-invention in the plays of Wole Soyinka’s Death and the King’s... Continue Reading
ABSTRACT Folklore as an aspect of the African oral tradition has been traced to traditional African society handed down by customs, beliefs and an aspect of culture handed down by our for forefathers through orature. Conflict that arises over death and the quest for re-invention in the plays of Wole Soyinka’s Death and the King’s Horseman... Continue Reading
ABSTRACT Folklore as an aspect of the African oral tradition has been traced to traditional African society handed down by customs, beliefs and an aspect of culture handed down by our for forefathers through orature.  Conflict that arises over death and the quest for re-invention in the plays of Wole Soyinka’s Death and the King’s Horseman... Continue Reading
TABLE OF CONTENTS DECLARATION ............................................................................................................................ i APPROVAL .................................................................................................................................. ii DEDICATION... Continue Reading
ABSTRACT The right to life is the most basic, fundamental, primordial and supreme right which human beings are entitled to have and without which the protection of all other human rights becomes either meaningless or less effective. Indeed, the right of each person to life is something, which is intrinsic to his status as a human being and which... Continue Reading
  • Type:Project
  • ID:LAW0221
  • Department:Law
  • Pages:103
ABSTRACT The right to life is the most basic, fundamental, primordial and supreme right which human beings are entitled to have and without which the protection of all other human rights becomes either meaningless or less effective. Indeed, the right of each person to life is something, which is intrinsic to his status as a human being and which... Continue Reading
  • Type:Project
  • ID:LAW0267
  • Department:Law
  • Pages:103
Call Us
whatsappWhatsApp Us